|
|
How can I find more detailed research and information about the search for Noahs's Ark in two, simple locations?
1) View and read the ArcImaging Search for Noah's Ark Online Presentation
2) Purchase the 482-page encyclopedic book with 265 photos/illustrations and 21 poco-authors "The Explorers Of Ararat:
And the Search for Noah's Ark".
I
saw a movie or read a book that stated or implied that Noah's Ark has already
been discovered.
Nothing in the research since the 1940's or the explorers' hundred expeditions has proven "beyond
a reasonable doubt" that Noah's Ark or it's remains have been discovered or that it has survived since the biblical flood of Noah.
NoahsArkSearch.com attempts to look at the legitimate claims and present them on this website but there is no proof,
photo, or science to support the ark's survival thus far, other than the eyewitness testimony.
Where
do you think Noah's Ark landed?
There are a lot of people convinced that Noah's
Ark either landed on present day Mount Ararat in Eastern Turkey or Mount Cudi in Southeastern Turkey. The Durupinar site popularized by Ron Wyatt has been eliminated as a
candidate as shown by
Turkish Geologist Murat Avci's The Formation and Mechanics of the great Telceker Earth Flow.
These mountains/hills are
within the ancient boundaries of "Urartu" or "mountains of Ararat"
as mentioned in the Bible. Along with the small bits of wood that have been found under the summit of Mount Cudi, only on Mount Ararat is there the possibility that
any substantial remains of the ark could still exist and are hidden by the ice. Ararat is a large and
inhospitable mountain that borders Armenia and Iran, and has a permanent
ice cap as well as glaciers. A concern is that there are no proven marine fossils
on Ararat as there are in the surrounding hills. This may indicates that Ararat
is possibly a Flood or post-Flood volcanic mountain. This would not make for
a good landing site for the animal cargo. Another major concern is that the moving portions of the ice cap
(17 square miles up to 300 feet deep) create unimaginable forces that could easily pulverize a wooden,
even petrified boat or barge.
ArcImaging has the technology to answer these questions
and is currently working with the Turkish Government to look underneath the ice cap as well as lower archaeological sites. ArcImaging is the
first organization to receive Turkish Federal Permission since 1990.
This is a long way of saying that we believe that Noah's Ark landed within the
"mountains of Ararat" region. If the ark did not land on the upper
reaches of Ararat, but on some other smaller mountain, it would seem likely
that the ark was used for shelter and fuel and did not survive the millenia since Noah's Flood.
Where can I read the biblical account of
Noah and the Genesis flood?
The Biblical account in the NIV English translation is listed at this link. From that link you can change
the Bible to other languages.
Assuming (huge assumption) that Noah's Ark survived the
millenia, where would be your best guess as to where it might be located?
Mount Ararat is a remote possibility, but the best one available as only small remnants of the boat would remain elsewhere.
First, nothing is normally visible on Ararat. Therefore, if it survived, it must be covered.
Ice would be the most appropriate covering (according the alleged eyewitnesses) rather than rock or lava
though if the ice were moving over the structure without protection, it would easily destoy it. If one believes the
alleged eyewitnesses, then the Abich II ice and edges of the ice cap above the Ahora Gorge would be the best guess
though the encroachment and retracting of the ice would also tear up a wood and pitched boat.
If one desires a non-moving ice location, then the Western Plateau would be a good place to search
since the Eastern Plateau was already sub-surface surveyed by the Willis Team including
ArcImaging's B.J. Corbin (1988). The Abich I approaching the Parrot Glacier should also be sub-surface surveyed
to remove those locations from possible resting places.
When do you expect the third edition (will be a classic for many libraries) of "The Explorers Of Ararat:
And the Search for Noah's Ark" book to be published?
GCI Books published the first edition in May
1999 and anticipates the third edition in 2008.
David Balsiger, Dr. Carl Baugh, Rev. Ken Long, and others have had their videos on TV stating that people
have discovered Noah's Ark. Have you seen or heard about these videos?
Yes, the videos of David Balsiger (The Quest for Noah's Ark and Ancient Mysteries),
Rev. Ken Long on TBN, and Carl Baugh on Kenneth Copeland have been studied but there is no conclusive evidence
for Noah's Ark. B.J. Corbin went to Ararat with Carl Baugh in 1990 and has spoken with Ken Long on the phone
as well as has seen the photos of his area of interest. There is nothing that is convincing from either.
How many years did it take Noah to build the Ark?
It is implied that prior to the flood, God made His decision to
destroy sinful mankind. At that time, Noah was
asked to build the Ark. At around 500 years old became the father of "Shem, Ham and Japeth" (Gen
5:32) and at 600 years of age finally entered the Ark (Gen 7:6). Therefore, taking the
difference in Noah's age from the "commission" to the flood was potentially up to one hundred
years to build the Ark since we don't know exactly when Noah began.
Most bibles assume an 18 inch cubit (although a 21 inch cubit is not unheard of), therefore, the Ark would approximately have a length of 450 feet, width of 75 feet and height of 45 feet.
How in the world could all the animals fit into the Ark?If you believe evolutionary dating mechanisms (old earth of 5 billion years old), which makes many unstated assumptions as fact both before and after the flood, then you would state that the flood was probably 20,000 to 50,000 years ago. This is why old earther's scoff at the search for the ark, as it is extremely unlikely any of the boat would have survived for tens of millennia. However, if the ark is actually scientifically documented to have survived, this would present a dilemma for old earther's, who typically rely on many generations being left out of the biblical genealogies.
If you question evolutionary dating mechanisms (young earth of 6,000-10,000 years old), then you would state that the flood was between about 5000 BC to 2350 BC, depending on how many generations were left out of the biblical genealogies. See the Link webpage for more information.
What
is the "latest" regarding the search for the ark?
What we know or can say is already on the News Page and the
ArcImaging Website.
Who created and maintains the
Noah's Ark Search website?
Explorer, editor and co-author of The Explorers Of Ararat:
And the Search for Noah's Ark book B.J. Corbin created this website and maintained it from 1995-2001
when he passed on the control of NoahsArkSearch.com to researcher, publisher, and fellow
Explorers of Ararat editor and co-author Rex Geissler. Geissler has added nearly a thousand more photographs and more research information to the websites since 2001. Geissler and Corbin are also the two original founders
of ArcImaging.
Can I copy photos from this website
to my own website?
No, all of the photos and items on this web site are copyrighted, especially since we work with many different researchers to post photos.
Please do not ask for other materials, where we post whatever we can on the web site.
Do
you plan to attempt any other research?
A legitimate scientific research organization like ArcImaging must conduct a sub-surface survey of the
Ararat ice before the search can reasonably be concluded on Mount Ararat. As the private RADAR satellites increase in capability, there may come a time where we can
purchase the imagery needed for analysis. As well, someone needs to take the lead for research on the Mount Cudi wood remains, etc. Regardless of that endeavor, the archaeological work will continue as we study civilizations and cultures that arose from Noah
and his family.
If researchers believe the Ark is over 10,000 feet above sea level, then is it physically possible that the Ark
floated up to Ararat there just isn't enough water present on the planet to raise sea level that high?
What
was Noah's wife's name? Answers in Genesis Fossils FAQ
Answers in Genesis Noah's Ark FAQ
The explanation that I've found intellectually satisfying is included in detail in the ArcImaging presentation. To summarize, at the time of the Flood, there was a single,
geologically undisturbed landmass, which is popularly called Pangaea, the existence of which is supported by
(amongst other reasons) the finding of matching rock layers on the east cost of South America and the west coast of Africa.
This is in agreement with Genesis 1:9, where it says that God "gathered into one place" the waters;
the corollary is that the land was also in one place.) This single continent had rather low mountains, if any.
The geological turmoil that began with the breakup of the "fountains of the deep" at the start of the Flood resulted in fractures
in the earth's crust which allowed upwelling magma to begin pushing up Ararat and other volcanic mountains (which were also higher
due to sediments the Flood deposited on the original bedrock.) Pillow lava noticed on Greater Ararat by geologists indicates
that there was magma outflow under water or ice or snow, possibly during the Flood period. By the time the Flood receded, the process of mountain-building
was well underway, but still relatively young, and Ararat and similar volcanic peaks continued to rise from underground pressures over the centuries,
raising the peak ever higher and the Ark along with it. The presence of small "parasite" cones on the slopes of Mount Ararat,
together with the still-present smell of sulfur, indicates the reality of volcanic methods of building the height of the mountain after Noah and the animals had already left the ark as there are at least
3 different time periods of lava flows around Ararat.
Incidentally, the many small "parasite" cones on the slopes helps explain why the Ark may not have been destroyed over time by volcanic activity:
the pressure was vented from those "parasite" cones, such that there was no single main cone from which magma would spew out and bury everything from the top down.
Perhaps hydrocarbon-containing fumes thus vented may have had a preservative effect on the Ark as well, like creosote that is used at the base of electric poles
to keep them from rotting.
In short, there is evidence that Mount Ararat may not have been a real high mountain at the time the Flood ended,
so the depth of water needed to cover may have been far less than is now the case. It grew to its present height in the centuries
after the Ark might have already nestled in a somewhat sheltered spot high up near the top.
According to the Book of Jubilees,
"And in the twenty-fifth [1205 A.M.] jubilee Noah took to himself a wife, and her name was Emzara, the daughter of Rake'el,
the daughter of his father's brother, in the first year in the fifth week [1207 A.M.]:
and in the third year thereof she bare him Shem, in the fifth year thereof [1209 A.M.]
she bare him Ham, and in the first year in the sixth week [1212 A.M.] she bare him Japheth."
According to a children's book written by an ordained Jewish rabbi - Noah's
wife's name was Naamah. The book's title is "A Prayer for the Earth: The
Story of Naamah, Noah's Wife". The author is Sandy Eisenberg Sasso who is
well-known.
Home |
Overview |
ArcImaging |
Resources |
FAQ's |
Links |
Products |
E-mail |
News
Presentation |
Urartu |
Mt. Ararat |
Mt. Cudi |
Durupinar |
Iran |
Bible Archaeology